Skip to main content

The top 3 things marketers want martech vendors to improve

Martech Stack Improvements Marketers Want

The good folks at Ascend2, a marketing industry research firm, recently released a study on Martech Stack Optimization. It’s the kind of report that I open with the enthusiasm of that kid from the movie A Christmas Story opening the present of his dreams. (I’ll try not to shoot my eye out.)

Lots of good data points, such as 71% of participants report that they will continue to invest moderately to significantly in their martech stack this year. (Some corroboration that martech is a $121 billion industry worldwide.)

The result I found most interesting, however, was the chart at the top of this post. Participants in the study reported which capabilities they would like martech vendors to improve in order to better optimize marketing.

Are you listening, my fellow martech vendor friends? The top three:

  1. Ease of use (greater utilization & faster adoption by team) — by a 14-point margin!
  2. Integration with other technologies in the stack — what I obsess about daily
  3. Ability to customize technology to specific needs — paging “citizen developers”

The first — ease of use — speaks to the growing stirrings of revolution in so-called enterprise software. It reminds me of the statement Warren Tomlin made a few years ago, when he was the chief innovation officer at IBM: “The last best experience anyone has anywhere becomes the minimum expectation for the experience they want everywhere.”

Enterprise users have gotten a taste of delightful-to-use products such as Dropbox, Slack, and Zoom and have decided that they — hey — they’d kind of like all the apps they use to be that friendly. There’s a lot of Christensen disruptive innovation happening along this axis of usability in martech these days, and I believe we’ll see a lot more in 2020.

Martech Enterprise Software Clunky

In second place? Integration with other technologies in the stack. We live in a best-of-breed cloud world, and marketers need — and now, more than ever, expect — the different tools they choose to work together.

This correlates with the data that my esteemed colleagues at MarTech Today found in their report about how and why marketers replace tools in their martech stack. “Better/easier integration” was equally as popular of a reason to switch as better features or reducing costs.

Reasons Commercial Martech Is Replaced

Note “better” — not just “easier” — integrations. As I wrote last year, not all integrations are created equal. Blindly tossing data, one way, over an API wall, is a far cry from support for two-way data synchronization, seamless workflow automation across apps, and embedded UI of apps within primary platforms.

Degree of integration matters, and marketers are now evaluating products on that dimension.

4 Layers of Integration

The third desire — the ability to customize martech products to specific needs — to me marks another inflection point in the industry. As marketing technology becomes more embedded in the end-to-end operations of a company, its full customer lifecycle, off-the-shelf playbooks and heuristics aren’t sufficient. Organizations need to bend martech products to their way of doing business, not the other way around.

This also means giving marketing technologists of all flavors — including just tech-savvy marketers — the freedom to build their own apps and automations. My claim that every marketer is now an app developer is becoming less hyperbole and more just how business runs. Note that in this Ascend2 study, the “ability to automate a process” ranked fifth on its own with 32% of marketers asking for greater flexibility there.

I also found it interesting that “use of AI and machine learning” was at the bottom of the list, with only 16% of marketers asking for more. I think there are two reasons for this:

First, AI hype in martech has crashed into the trough of disillusionment. Thank heavens.

And second, good AI and machine learning is successfully being embedded into the overall product experience of many martech tools — it’s part of delivering better usability, without having to be explicitly in your face. Subtlety is part of its achievement.

Okay, martech vendors: the market has spoken. How will you respond?

P.S. A friendly reminder that YOU ONLY HAVE ONE MORE WEEK to get the early bird “alpha” rate on tickets to the MarTech Conference in San Jose, April 15-17. Check out the agenda of the amazing speakers and sessions that we’ll have. If you want the ground truth of martech and how to maximize its impact in your organization, this is the springtime event you won’t want to miss.

The post The top 3 things marketers want martech vendors to improve appeared first on Chief Marketing Technologist.



from Chief Marketing Technologist https://ift.tt/2OQnpo3
via IFTTT

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Keala Kanae – Net Worth, Courses, Scam?

Keala Kanae net worth : Keala Kanae is an internet marketer with a net worth of approximately $3 million dollars. Digital marketing seems like a perfect way to make money from home at this time when the world hits a global pandemic. There are tons of internet gurus to teach you how to make a 6-figure income monthly. Take it from Keala Kanae of Fullstaq Marketer – the same guy behind AWOL Academy. At the same time, you’ve heard some reviews from past customers before and would like to know whether diving with Kanae is a good idea. Is it worth the time, effort, and investment with him? Will your expertise and income expand given the tricks mentioned in their books? Keala Kanae Net Worth According to Forbes and Huffpost , Kanae earned his first $1 million in AWOL’s first year. In 2017, his net worth grew to a massive $30 million. Keala Kanae’s net worth is somewhere between $30 million to $50 million. Who is Keala Kanae? Probably you’ve come across his ads on Facebook and YouT...

What is a Local Citation? Local SEO

In simple SEO terms, a local citation refers to any mention of your company online. This could be in a business directory, or on an industry-specific site, a blog or any other local website. Although local citations can help you rank in local search results, they are no longer a major ranking factor . However, they are still worth considering in order to promote your business. Common citations you are likely to already know of include listings on business directory websites such as Yell or Thomson Local . A complete citation should include the name, address and phone number of your business. Local citations do not always include a link to your site although they are more valuable if they do. What do they do? Citations help rank your Google Local Pack listing (this was formerly called Google+ Local map) by providing Google with credible sources of information about your business. Citations tell Google that your business exists, is legitimate and that what you say about it is accur...

The beginner’s guide to semantic search: Examples and tools

Ever since Google’s Hummingbird, the term “semantic search” has been thrown around a lot. Yet, the concept is often misunderstood. What is semantic search and how it helps SEO efforts? When people speak to each other, they understand more than just words. They understand the context, non-verbal cues  (facial expressions, nuances of the voice, etc.) and so much more. It comes naturally, so we don’t really appreciate how difficult it is to explain what is being communicated without the help of all “beyond-words” signals. Factors that make the lives of both Google and SEO so difficult Google is trying (and often struggling) to understand what it is that their users want (without actually seeing or hearing them) SEOs are trying to reverse-engineer what it is that Google managed to understand from their users’ queries and how to build pages that meet those mysterious criteria. As Google’s algorithm is getting more mature, it is becoming even more difficult to decode what...