Skip to main content

Future of Media: Facebook's news truce, should you fake a billboard? New innovation column

This is an extract from The Drum’s Future of Media briefing. You can subscribe to it here if you’d want the full thing in your inbox once a week.

John McCarthy (Twitter, Linkedin, email) with a final reminder to enter The Drum Online Media Awards and get your work and your teams the recognition they deserve.

Now to the stories. 

Media Innovation Round-Up 

I'm pleased to welcome new columnist Marek Wrobel, head of futures at Havas Media to The Future of Media coverage. Yes, there are a lot of futures and medias in that sentence. In his regular video newsletter, Wrobel sniffs out innovative media tech like AR, VR, gaming, phygital, QR, whatever you can think of, and analyses its utility to marketers. 

For The Drum, once a month, he'll round up cool activations you need to know about (if you want to be at the cutting edge of media that is).

In his debut, he goes deep on a Lego music video app, an Alexa tour of Abu Dhabi and the NFL's experience in Fortnite. I can't recommend it enough, read it here. 

What does OOH dooh?

The out of home advertising industry hit the gym while we were locked away accumulating more digital screens, better buying software, and a slew of clever dynamic campaigns as a result. 

So when an out-of-the-box billboard (Marmite) and poster (KitKat but not really KitKat) went 'marketing viral' last week, it was clearly time to study the changing nature of the medium.

One ad ran in the real world, and the other didn't, yet both had the same online plaudits. This raised two questions: can you use custom OOH builds and great ideas to drive real PR fame? And do you need to incur the cost of running the ad in the real world?

The advent of the smartphone and social media sharing, a famine of digital creativity, and the very real nature of OOH have all contributed to the OOH PR springboard effect. Learn more here.

Facebook again

Facebook time. It's been a bit more WTF than usual. 

Facebook's Australia new blockage was a spit-take moment.

First I thought: 'Good, Facebook would be better without news right? And maybe the news would be better without Facebook.'

Then I read that about 40% of Australians use Facebook for news. That's a lot of good people getting a lot of good information from the social network... maybe. We know the algorithm (or human engagement patterns), favours outrage and divisiveness.

So then I saw publishers buying Facebook ads telling readers to visit their sites direct. Even at war, the newsfeed addiction couldn't be broken. We had a clumsy law trying to shake some more coin out of Facebook, and the stand-off would have no winners, as UM's Adam Morton wrote for us. I'm very much in the big tech should probably pay more tax camp but I think he was right. 

The publishers could smell blood. Facebook had urged them to build huge audiences on its platform, then strangled the organic reach. It told them that video was the future, which clobbered good journalism in favour of not-so-good social-friendly chaff. Then shock horror, Facebook's metrics weren't up to scratch, which is actually pretty common in any analytics dashboards, but most don't merit a court case to hide them right enough.

Then Facebook reached a truce with the government after News Corp reached a deal with it. This doesn't necessarily help smaller publishers who are still struggling. Australia wants Facebook to acknowledge this, and efforts are underway for reimbursement. There are further deals coming in Canada. 

Nick Clegg, Facebook's vice president of global affairs, is a busy man. And the ex-UK deputy prime minister is in full-spin mode. He shared 'The Real Story of What Happened With News on Facebook in Australia'. Take 'real' with a pinch of salt, but also understand that publishers blatantly misrepresented the practicalities and worst implications of the Oz law now there's a profit to be made. 

Clegg said it sent "5.1 billion free referrals to Australian publishers worth an estimated AU$407m to the news industry".

I wonder what content benefited from these big numbers. Was it stuff with utility to society or the clickbait, or worse yet, clickhate, that seems to perform admirably on Facebook? Anecdotally, some Australians seemed to prefer Facebook without the publishers, a reminder of the time, long ago, when the social network was an intimate place to talk to, and poke, friends. That seems quaint now. 

In somewhat related news, in the UK, the CMA is making more noise about the ad duopoly, and it appears that Facebook kicked the Myanmar military off of the site after a military coup.

Other Stuff

I've now hit my word count (thanks Facebook) so here are some great links I think you should check out. And I mean that. So do it. 

That's all for this week. If you missed the last issue, read it here. And you can subscribe to our other briefings here.



from News https://ift.tt/384sxP1
via IFTTT
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Keala Kanae – Net Worth, Courses, Scam?

Keala Kanae net worth : Keala Kanae is an internet marketer with a net worth of approximately $3 million dollars. Digital marketing seems like a perfect way to make money from home at this time when the world hits a global pandemic. There are tons of internet gurus to teach you how to make a 6-figure income monthly. Take it from Keala Kanae of Fullstaq Marketer – the same guy behind AWOL Academy. At the same time, you’ve heard some reviews from past customers before and would like to know whether diving with Kanae is a good idea. Is it worth the time, effort, and investment with him? Will your expertise and income expand given the tricks mentioned in their books? Keala Kanae Net Worth According to Forbes and Huffpost , Kanae earned his first $1 million in AWOL’s first year. In 2017, his net worth grew to a massive $30 million. Keala Kanae’s net worth is somewhere between $30 million to $50 million. Who is Keala Kanae? Probably you’ve come across his ads on Facebook and YouT
25 comments
Read more

Will Durex’s rebranded packaging help solve its biggest challenge?

Durex, the leading condom brand from Reckitt, recently announced its rebranded packaging for the Singapore market. The Drum spoke to Durex Singapore marketing director Justin Lee about how this refresh will reinvigorate its marketing. The new packaging includes new labels, colours and designs of the range as well as new navigation icons to help shoppers make a better choice. As a part of the month-long campaign, the condom brand will also be making its fit guide available on Shopee’s Durex official store. Having started in the UK , the rebranding is being rolled out gradually to countries worldwide and is now available in Singapore, informs Justin Lee, marketing director of Reckitt Singapore in an exclusive chat with The Drum. He elaborates on how with the new packaging, the brand hopes to find a solution to its biggest challenge: “of debunking reasons for not wearing a condom and normalizing this habit amongst the consumers.” The rebranding is part of Durex ’s year-long initiative
Post a Comment
Read more

What is a Local Citation? Local SEO

In simple SEO terms, a local citation refers to any mention of your company online. This could be in a business directory, or on an industry-specific site, a blog or any other local website. Although local citations can help you rank in local search results, they are no longer a major ranking factor . However, they are still worth considering in order to promote your business. Common citations you are likely to already know of include listings on business directory websites such as Yell or Thomson Local . A complete citation should include the name, address and phone number of your business. Local citations do not always include a link to your site although they are more valuable if they do. What do they do? Citations help rank your Google Local Pack listing (this was formerly called Google+ Local map) by providing Google with credible sources of information about your business. Citations tell Google that your business exists, is legitimate and that what you say about it is accur
8 comments
Read more